TABLE 3.
Modeled behavioral data comparison outcomes.
| Valence |
Arousal |
|||||
| Contrast | χ2 value | df | p-value | χ2 value | df | p-value |
| Rating = Intercept – Rating = Phase + Intercept | 195.67 | 4 | <0.001*** | 235.06 | 4 | <0.001*** |
| Rating = Phase + Intercept – Rating = Phase + Model + Intercept | 17.30 | 2 | <0.001*** | 31.90 | 2 | <0.001*** |
| Rating = Phase + Model + Intercept – Rating = Phase + Model + MSS + Intercept | 0.87 | 1 | 0.351 | 0.02 | 1 | 0.894 |
| Rating = Phase + Model + Intercept – Rating = Phase × Model + Intercept | 35.77 | 6 | <0.001*** | 51.94 | 6 | <0.001*** |
| Rating = Phase × Model + Intercept – Rating = Phase × Model × MSS + Intercept | 6.76 | 12 | 0.873 | 8.46 | 12 | 0.748 |
All models included auditory tolerance threshold scores as covariates. Bold p-values indicate significant model comparisons. ***p < 0.001.