Table 4.
Conventional LCA of solar and solar hybrid ORC plants.
| ORC Heat Source | LCA FU | Boundary | Inventory Database | LCIA Method | Tool/Software | Remark | Reference(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solar ORC plant | 1 kWh of primary energy production | Cradle to gate | Literature data and Ecoinvent | IMPACT 2002+; IPCC 2013 GWP 100a; cumulative energy demand (CED) | SimaPro | The study identified that the solar multiple (SM) is an important parameter that must be carefully selected to achieve an environmentally benign solar-ORC plant. It was demonstrated specifically that doubling the solar field area from 50 m2 to 100 m2 can reduce the environmental impact from 140 μPt/kWh to 104 μPt/kWh. | (Cioccolanti et al., 2019) |
| Solar-Geothermal ORC plant | 1 year of electrical and thermal energy production | Cradle to gate | Ecoinvent | CML 2011 baseline | SimaPro | The study demonstrated that the exploitation of solar-geothermal energy sources by ORC plants is an environmentally-favorable solution in the context of sustainable development. | (Ruzzenenti et al., 2014) |
| Solar ORC integrated with an ammonia synthesis plant | 1.83 kWh of electricity or 1 kg of ammonia production | Cradle to grave | Life plant/literature data; Ecoinvent | CIA-LP and ReCiPe 2016 Endpoint (H) | SimaPro | Low environmental impacts were obtained generally for the integrated plant, specifically at about 0.69 CO2-eq/kg of ammonia, based on GWP midpoint, and about 0.0000817 pt based on endpoint human health indicator. | (S. Liu et al., 2021) |