Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 7;12(31):19741–19750. doi: 10.1039/d2ra02980d

Comparison of sorption performances of the present study and other reported literature.

Sorbent Element Enrichment factor LOD (μg L−1) RSD (%)
Polyethylene glycol loaded on silica gel (SiO2@PEG)54 Cu(ii), Cd(ii), Mn(ii) 66.6 0.33–1.20 3.42–4.91
Dithioxamide onto activated carbon (AC@DTO)55 Ni(ii), Co(ii), Cu(ii) 330 0.5–0.8 <2
1-(2-Pyridylazo)-2-naphthol loaded on silica gel (SiO2@PAN)56 Cr(iii), Mn(ii), Fe(iii), Ni(ii), Cu(ii), Cd(ii), Pb(ii) 80–150 0.13–4.1 5–26
Thiosalicylic acid loaded on silica gel57 Pb(ii) 150 3.7 <1.5
Dihydroxybenzene loaded on silica gel58 Cu(ii), Pb(ii), Fe(iii), Zn(ii), Co(ii), Ni(ii), Cd(ii) 250 4 1.4–7.0
Amberlite XAD-2010 resin59 Mn(ii), Co(ii), Ni(ii), Cu(ii), Cd(ii), Pb(ii) 100 0.08–0.26 1.9–5.1
This work: (SiO2–(CH2)3– Im– C18) Cr(iii), Ni(ii), Cu(ii), Cd(ii), Pb(ii) 60–150 0.724–11.329 0.941–1.351