Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 7.
Published in final edited form as: Science. 2022 Apr 21;376(6591):410–416. doi: 10.1126/science.abo0039

Table 1.

Development of catalytic reaction conditions.

graphic file with name nihms-1820036-t0001.jpg
Entry Deviation from standard conditions %conv ArBr %yield 5 %yield 5-iso
1 Standard conditions 86 75 0
2 (bpp)NiCl2 instead of [(bpp)MnCl2 + NiCl2•dme] 92 83 8
3 (bpp)Co(OAc)2 instead of (bpp)MnCl2 72 35 6
4 (bpp)FeBr2 instead of (bpp)MnCl2 74 29 11
5 Constant current: 6 mA 82 49 1
6 Constant current: 1.5 mA 62 45 0
7 Constant voltage: Ecell = 0.4 V 81 47 0
8 Constant voltage: Ecell = 0.6 V 89 53 1
9 No NiCl2•dme 0 0 0
10 No (bp)MnCl2 7 0 0
11 No iPrQ ligand 6 5 1
12 Zn0 anode, no e-chem 24 17 1
13 Zn0 powder (3 equiv), no e-chem 74 60 5
14 5 mol% iPrQ 78 43 1
15 15 mol% iPrQ 84 68 0
16 200 mM ArBr and 200 mM tBuBr 100 57 0

Calibrated GC yields against an internal standard are reported. CCE, constant current electrolysis.