Table 2.
Survey results of the spoken dialogue system
Question items | Doctor | Nurse | Patient | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Q1. I could understand SDS’s words well. | 6.6 ± 0.699 | 6.8 ± 0.422 | 5.7 ± 1.059 | 0.008* |
Q2. The volume, speed, and sound quality of the SDS were adequate. | 6.6 ± 0.699 | 6.7 ± 0.675 | 6.0 ± 1.155 | 0.171 |
Q3. SDS asked the proper questions. | 5.4 ± 1.506 | 6.0 ± 0.816 | 5.2 ± 1.549 | 0.390 |
Q4. SDS gave an appropriate response. | 4.9 ± 1.370 | 5.3 ± 1.418 | 5.4 ± 1.075 | 0.664 |
Q5. In conversation with SDS, I was able to fully express what I wanted to say. | 4.6 ± 1.647 | 5.5 ± 1.179 | 4.5 ± 1.269 | 0.222 |
Q6. SDS seems to understand well what I'm saying. | 4.7 ± 1.337 | 5.6 ± 1.265 | 4.7 ± 1.252 | 0.214 |
Q7. Conversations with SDS were not much different from conversations with people. | 4.3 ± 1.337 | 5.4 ± 1.075 | 5.1 ± 1.370 | 0.153 |
Q8. I think positively about assisting my medical care through the SDS conversation. | 5.5 ± 1.179 | 6.1 ± 0.568 | 5.0 ± 1.491 | 0.118 |
Q9. There was no objection to the conversation with SDS. | 5.3 ± 1.494 | 6.5 ± 0.527 | 6.1 ± 0.994 | 0.057 |
Q10. The conversation with SDS was overall satisfactory. | 5.3 ± 1.160 | 6.2 ± 0.919 | 5.4 ± 1.265 | 0.165 |
Mean | 5.3 ± 0.777 | 6.0 ± 0.547 | 5.3 ± 0.522 | 0.136 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
SDS, spoken dialogue system.
One-way analysis of variance, post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference analysis was performed, the group that made the difference.