Skip to main content
. 2022 May 12;19(2):348–356. doi: 10.14245/ns.2143080.540

Table 2.

Survey results of the spoken dialogue system

Question items Doctor Nurse Patient p-value
Q1. I could understand SDS’s words well. 6.6 ± 0.699 6.8 ± 0.422 5.7 ± 1.059 0.008*
Q2. The volume, speed, and sound quality of the SDS were adequate. 6.6 ± 0.699 6.7 ± 0.675 6.0 ± 1.155 0.171
Q3. SDS asked the proper questions. 5.4 ± 1.506 6.0 ± 0.816 5.2 ± 1.549 0.390
Q4. SDS gave an appropriate response. 4.9 ± 1.370 5.3 ± 1.418 5.4 ± 1.075 0.664
Q5. In conversation with SDS, I was able to fully express what I wanted to say. 4.6 ± 1.647 5.5 ± 1.179 4.5 ± 1.269 0.222
Q6. SDS seems to understand well what I'm saying. 4.7 ± 1.337 5.6 ± 1.265 4.7 ± 1.252 0.214
Q7. Conversations with SDS were not much different from conversations with people. 4.3 ± 1.337 5.4 ± 1.075 5.1 ± 1.370 0.153
Q8. I think positively about assisting my medical care through the SDS conversation. 5.5 ± 1.179 6.1 ± 0.568 5.0 ± 1.491 0.118
Q9. There was no objection to the conversation with SDS. 5.3 ± 1.494 6.5 ± 0.527 6.1 ± 0.994 0.057
Q10. The conversation with SDS was overall satisfactory. 5.3 ± 1.160 6.2 ± 0.919 5.4 ± 1.265 0.165
Mean 5.3 ± 0.777 6.0 ± 0.547 5.3 ± 0.522 0.136

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

SDS, spoken dialogue system.

*

One-way analysis of variance, post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference analysis was performed, the group that made the difference.