. 2022 May 28;101(8):101978. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101978

Table 10.

Effect of dietary enzyme supplementation on nutrient digestibility, sugar degradation rate and energy value of broiler chickens on d 28 (Experiment 2).

Treatment¹	Nutrient digestibility (%)		Sugar degradation rate (%)			Energy value (Kcal/kg)
Treatment¹	DM²	CP	Sucrose	Raffinose	Stachyose	AME	AMEn
Con	75.52	60.49	99.62	92.50^d	93.15^d	3,029^b	2,993^b
GAS	75.27	58.92	99.70	95.94^bc	96.39^bc	3,029^b	2,993^b
MAS	76.53	61.13	99.65	96.98^b	96.84^b	3,110^a	3,063^a
PRO	75.65	58.91	99.71	94.40^cd	94.38^cd	3,077^ab	3,032^ab
GAS+PRO	76.22	60.59	99.49	99.72^a	99.80^a	3,086^ab	3,041^ab
MAS+PRO	76.81	60.06	99.67	99.72^a	99.98^a	3,139^a	3,094^a
GAS+MAS+PRO	76.07	57.48	99.51	99.72^a	99.96^a	3,079^a	3,036^ab
SEM	0.200	0.381	0.021	0.497	0.494	9.08	8.60
P-value	0.378	0.203	0.105	<0.001	<0.001	0.006	0.015

^a-d

Means with different superscripts within the same row are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Con, control diet; GAS, α-galactosidase; MAS, β-mannanase; PRO, Protease; GAS+PRO, α-galactosidase+ Protease; MAS+PRO; β-mannanase+ Protease; GAS+MAS+PRO, α-galactosidase+β-mannanase +Protease.

Abbreviations: AME, apparent metabolizable energy; AMEn, nitrogen corrected apparent metabolizable energy; CP, crude protein; DM, dry matter.