Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 28;28(24):2748–2757. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i24.2748

Table 1.

Characteristics of study subjects

Patient (n) 62
Age [mean ± SD (range), yr] 60.4 ± 12.8, (40-89)
Sex (male) 41.9%
Polyp (n) 108
Location (cecum/ascending/transverse/descending/sigmoid/rectum, n) 13/20/38/7/25/5
Morphology (0-Is/0-IIa, n) 13/95
Size [mean ± SD (range), mm] 7.45 (2.83, 5-15)
Brown slits (positive/negative, n) 57/51
Endoscopic diagnosis (adenoma/SSL/hyperplastic polyp, n) 59/30/19
Histopathological diagnosis (adenoma/SSL/MVHP/GCHP, n) 591/16/27/6
Endoscopist (1/2, n) 75/33
Endoscope (CF-HQ290Z/PCF-H290Z, n) 60/48
1

All adenomas were tubular, low grade.

SD: Standard deviation; SSL: Sessile serrated lesion; MVHP: Microvesicular hyperplastic polyp; GCHP: Goblet cell-rich hyperplastic polyp.