Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 6;20:105. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01998-8

Table 2.

Overview of EQ-5D-Y valuation studies which are published, data collection completed, underway

Country/Region Status of EQ-5D-Y value set Departures from the protocol? Additional Methodological research How are values anchored?
Japan Published—see Shiroiwa et al. [13] cTTO designs with five blocks each with six health states; Same sample completed both DCE and cTTO tasks in face-to-face interviews Mapping DCE data onto the cTTO data
Slovenia Published—see Prevolnik-Rupel et al. [12] Standard DCE included an adolescent sample aged between 11 and 17 years [23] Rescaling based on the single state “33333”
Spain Published—see Ramos-Goni et al. [14] cTTO tasks switched from face-to-face to online settings part-way through DCE included an adolescent sample aged between 11 and 17 years [23] Rescaling based on the single state “33333”
Germany Published—see Kreimeier et al. [15] cTTO tasks switched from face-to-face to online settings part-way through DCE also included in cTTO interviews to compare interview-based and online DCE results; DCE included an adolescent sample aged between 11 and 17 years [23] Mapping DCE data onto the cTTO data*
Belgium Data collection completed cTTO tasks switched from face-to-face to online settings part-way through Additional DCE respondents were included, whom completed tasks from the perspective of a child (8–12 years old) and adolescents (13–18 years old) Rescaling based on the single state “33333”*
China (Mainland) Date collection completed Expanded cTTO design to allow possibility of modelling cTTO-only value set (a small orthogonal design with 18 states + 10 from protocol) Methods to be determined
Hong Kong Date collection completed both DCE and cTTO tasks administered in face-to-face CAPI DCE and cTTO tasks using two perspectives: a child (10 year old) and adult’s own perspective Methods to be determined
Hungary Data collection completed Standard Additional four TTO tasks using adult’s own perspective Rescaling based on the single state “33333”*
Indonesia Data collection completed Expanded TTO design (18 health states arranged orthogonal design + 5 suggested states + 2 states with higher level sum score) Mapping DCE data onto the cTTO data*
Paper-and-pencil survey for DCE
Netherlands Data collection completed Expanded TTO design to allow possibility of modelling TTO-only value set (28 states divided into 3 blocks of 10 stats each; 33333 and at least one mild state in each block); cTTO tasks completed in online settings An additional cTTO sample (n = 203) was collected, in which the cTTO task was framed asking respondents to indicate what they think a 10 year-old child would prefer Different approaches used, including (1) Rescaling based on the single state “33333” and (2) mapping DCE data onto cTTO data
Australia Underway Expanded cTTO design to allow possibility of modelling cTTO-only value set; cTTO tasks planned in online settings Additional DCE with duration and DCE with dead tasks Different approaches planned:
(1) Rescaling based on the single state “33333”; and using other health states in cTTO as the sole anchor
(2) Mapping DCE data onto cTTO data
(3) using DCE with duration; (4) using DCE with dead questions
US Underway Preparatory work underway
Brazil Underway Preparatory work underway
Malaysia+ Underway In all four cases, an expanded cTTO design to allow possibility of modelling cTTO-only value set (a small orthogonal design with 18 states + 10 from protocol) A pilot DCE study of 400 individuals in each country/region, who will be randomised to the perspective of a hypothetical child from the following age groups: “5–7 years old”, “8–10 years old”, “11–13 years old” and “14–15 years old” Different approaches planned:
Singapore+ Underway
Taiwan+ Underway (1) Rescaling based on the single state “33333”
Vietnam+ Underway (2) Mapping DCE data onto cTTO data
(3) a hybrid model

*For unpublished studies, we list here the anchoring method reported at the workshop, based on preliminary analysis

+Four different value sets for Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan and Vietnam will be generated separately, but they follow the same study design and methodological add-ons