TABLE 4.
Subject no. | Clone | Sequence length (bp) | Ambiguity
|
Closest relatives (% sequence similarityb) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
bp | % | ||||
I | 7B | 1,267 | 16 | 1.3 | B. adolescentis (98)a, B. ruminantium (97), B. dentium (95) |
I | 7G | 1,365 | 15 | 1.1 | B. adolescentis (98)a, B. ruminantium (97), B. dentium (96) |
II | 9A | 1,346 | 11 | 0.8 | B. adolescentis (97)a, B. ruminantium (96), B. dentium (95) |
II | 9B | 1,360 | 5 | 0.4 | B. pseudocatenulatum (98), B. angulatum (97), B. dentium (96) |
II | 9C | 1,267 | 8 | 0.6 | B. adolescentis (98)a, B. ruminantium (97), B. dentium (96) |
III | 13D | 1,297 | 12 | 0.9 | B. pseudocatenulatum (98), B. ruminantium (97), B. adolescentis (97)a |
IV | 15A | 1,363 | 5 | 0.4 | B. adolescentis (99)a, B. ruminantium (98), B. dentium (97) |
IV | 15B | 1,357 | 6 | 0.4 | B. adolescentis (99)a, B. ruminantium (98), B. dentium (96) |
IV | 15D | 1,365 | 10 | 0.7 | B. adolescentis (98)a, B. ruminantium (97), B. dentium (96) |
V | 16B | 1,268 | 18 | 1.4 | B. adolescentis (97)a, B. ruminantium (96), B. dentium (96) |
V | 16C | 1,287 | 15 | 1.2 | B. ruminantium (97), B. adolescentis (97)a, B. pseudocatenulatum (96) |
V | 16F | 1,362 | 17 | 1.3 | B. adolescentis (98)a, B. ruminantium (97), B. dentium (96) |
Compared to the 16S rDNA sequences determined in this study.
Percent similarity values from pairwise sequence alignments.