Skip to main content
. 2001 Feb;67(2):504–513. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.2.504-513.2001

TABLE 4.

Sequencing of bifidobacterial clones from fecal samples

Subject no. Clone Sequence length (bp) Ambiguity
Closest relatives (% sequence similarityb)
bp %
I 7B 1,267 16 1.3 B. adolescentis (98)a, B. ruminantium (97), B. dentium (95)
I 7G 1,365 15 1.1 B. adolescentis (98)a, B. ruminantium (97), B. dentium (96)
II 9A 1,346 11 0.8 B. adolescentis (97)a, B. ruminantium (96), B. dentium (95)
II 9B 1,360 5 0.4 B. pseudocatenulatum (98), B. angulatum (97), B. dentium (96)
II 9C 1,267 8 0.6 B. adolescentis (98)a, B. ruminantium (97), B. dentium (96)
III 13D 1,297 12 0.9 B. pseudocatenulatum (98), B. ruminantium (97), B. adolescentis (97)a
IV 15A 1,363 5 0.4 B. adolescentis (99)a, B. ruminantium (98), B. dentium (97)
IV 15B 1,357 6 0.4 B. adolescentis (99)a, B. ruminantium (98), B. dentium (96)
IV 15D 1,365 10 0.7 B. adolescentis (98)a, B. ruminantium (97), B. dentium (96)
V 16B 1,268 18 1.4 B. adolescentis (97)a, B. ruminantium (96), B. dentium (96)
V 16C 1,287 15 1.2 B. ruminantium (97), B. adolescentis (97)a, B. pseudocatenulatum (96)
V 16F 1,362 17 1.3 B. adolescentis (98)a, B. ruminantium (97), B. dentium (96)
a

Compared to the 16S rDNA sequences determined in this study. 

b

Percent similarity values from pairwise sequence alignments.