Skip to main content
. 2022 May 27;48(4):e20210329. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210329

Table 2. Comparison of median maximum standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass, mean standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass, and target-to-background ratio values with HRCT patterns in lung lobes.a .

HRCT PATTERNS
Honeycombing
(n = 16)
GGO
(n = 28)
p GGOF
(n = 53)
GGO
(n = 28)
p*
SULmax 1.95
[0.0-3.8]
1.75
[0.0-3.8]
0.589 1.79
[0.0-5.3]
1.75
[0.0-3.8]
0.850
SULmean 0.92
[0.57 -2.06]
3.4
[0.44-1.48]
0.179 0.77
[0.35-1.67]
0.79
[0.44-1.48]
0.980
TBR 4.0
[0.0-7.17]
0.0
[0.0-7.04]
0.880 3.6
[0.0-11.52]
0.0
[0.0-7.04]
0.195
Normal
(n = 13)
GGO
(n = 28)
Normal
(n = 13)
Honeycombing
(n = 16)
SULmax 0.0
[0.0-1.21]
1.75
[0.0-3.8]
0.001 0.0
[0.0-1.21]
1.95
[0.0-3.8]
0.002
SULmean 0.63
[0.46-0.76]
0.79
[0.44-1.48]
0.001 0.63
[0.46-0.76]
0.92
[0.57-2.06]
< 0.001
TBR 0.0
[0.0-2.57]
0.0
[0.0-7.04]
0.001 0.0
[0.0-2.57]
4.0
[0.0-7.17]
0.002

GGO: pure ground-glass opacity; GGOF: ground-glass opacity with fibrosis (a reticular pattern, bronchiectasis, or honeycombing); SULmax: maximum standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass; SULmean: mean standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass; and TBR: target-to-background ratio. aValues expressed as median (min-max). *Mann-Whitney U test. Note: SULmax and TBR values equal to zero are related to regions without any qualitatively outstanding metabolic activity for measurement.