Skip to main content
. 2022 May 16;21(6):e12816. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12816

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

NSG1 KO affects motor coordination but not motor learning. (A) The latency to fall from the rotating rod (4–40 RPM) is presented. Means from both groups increased across trials and there were no difference between wild‐type and KO animals. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. (B) Representative compliant runs of wild‐type (upper) and NSG1 KO (lower) animals depicting automated detection of left hind (LH), right hind (RH), left front (LF), and right front (RF) paws. (C) Pooled data reveal significant differences between genotypes specifically for crucient (Ca, Cb) step patterns but not for alternate (Aa, Ab) or rotary (Ra, Rb) step sequences. (D) Genotypes also differed significantly in total print area, with statistical significance reached for RF, but where all paws showed ~16% reduced print size. Genotypes did not differ in stride length (E), swing time (F), or swing speed (G). n = 12/genotype