Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 30;13(3):221–229. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2022.0097

Table 3.

Comparison of treatment-related characteristics between patients with CRE and those with CRAB

Variable Category Total (n=418) CRE (n=116) CRAB (n=302) p
Invasive procedures Surgery 215 (51.4) 63 (54.3) 152 (50.3) 0.466
Bronchoscopy 94 (22.5) 22 (19.0) 72 (23.8) 0.285
G-endoscopy 63 (15.1) 22 (19.0) 41 (13.6) 0.168
Invasive device Urinary catheter 380 (90.9) 103 (88.8) 277 (91.7) 0.351
Central catheter 352 (84.2) 93 (80.2) 259 (85.8) 0.161
Gastrointestinal tube 336 (80.4) 88 (75.9) 248 (82.1) 0.149
Arterial catheter 322 (77.0) 77 (66.4) 245 (81.1) 0.001
Mechanical ventilator 275 (65.8) 58 (50.0) 217 (71.9) <0.001
Drainage tube 138 (33.0) 42 (36.2) 96 (31.8) 0.390
Antibiotics Penicillin 274 (65.6) 68 (58.6) 206 (68.2) 0.065
Quinolone 237 (56.7) 59 (50.9) 178 (58.9) 0.136
Carbapenem 228 (54.5) 58 (50.0) 170 (56.3) 0.247
Cephalosporin 225 (53.8) 62 (53.4) 163 (54.0) 0.923
Vancomycin 165 (39.5) 43 (37.1) 122 (40.4) 0.533
Medication Antiacids 375 (89.7) 103 (88.8) 272 (90.1) 0.701
Steroids 187 (44.7) 46 (39.7) 141 (46.7) 0.195
TPN 369 (88.3) 90 (77.6) 279 (92.4) <0.001

Data are presented as n (%).

CRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; CRAB, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; TPN, total parenteral nutrition.