Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 3;65(7):322–329. doi: 10.3345/cep.2021.01753

Table 2.

Types of child abuse reporters, 2019 and 2020

No. 2019
2020
Mandatory reporter of child abuse Nonmandatory reporter of child abuse Mandatory reporter of child abuse Nonmandatory reporter of child abuse
1 Primary/middle/high school employees (5,901, 15.4%) Employers 0f Child Protection Service as nonmandatory reporters (12,389, 32.3%) Primary/middle/high school employees (3,805, 9.8%) Employers of child protection service as nonmandatory reporters (10,254, 26.3%)
2 Nursing staffs at schools (448, 1.2%) Parents (6,506, 17%) Employers of child protection service as mandatory reporters (2,394, 6.1%) Parents (6284, 16.1%)
3 Employers of child welfare institution (337, 0.9%) Child self (4652, 12.4%) Public officers in the field of child welfare (984, 2.5%) Child self (5533, 14.2%)
4 Healthcare provider/medical professionals (293, 0.8%) Neighbors/friends (1,718, 4.5%) Employers in institutions for child welfare (711, 1.8%) Neighbors/friends (1,945, 5.0%)
5 Employers in institutions for adolescents’ welfare (286, 0.7%) Others (986, 2.6%) Public officers in the field of social welfare (632, 1.6%) Others (1,127, 2.9%)
6 Employers in institutions for social welfare (226, 0.7%) Public officers in the field of social welfare (959, 2.5%) Healthcare provider/medical professionals (363, 0.9%) Child’s relatives (653, 1.7%)

This table shows the first top 6 ranking of types of child abuse reporters who are mandatory and nonmandatory reporters, respectively, in 2 consecutive years.

Data from Child Abuse & Neglect Korea, 2019 and 2020. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea.