Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 24;16:920538. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.920538

TABLE 2.

Outcomes of the two-way ANOVA for the area sizes A (in mm2⋅μV⋅105) with factors of intensity and session when considering the highest cortex mesh resolution and when removing the non-MEP points (M2)*.

⟨A⟩ at 105% RMT Intensity Session Intensity × session p-value pairwise comparison





FDI EDC FCR F p F p F p FDI/EDC FDI/FCR EDC/FCR
FDI 1.61 ± 0.24 2.48 ± 0.60 4.86 ± 1.41 F(2, 36) = 4.855 0.032 F(1, 18) = 1.390 0.254 F(2, 36) = 0.634 0.454 0.307 0.087 0.195
ADM 0.92 ± 0.21 0.99 ± 0.17 2.16 ± 0.60 F(2, 24) = 5.385 0.032 F(1, 12) = 1.216 0.292 F(2, 24) = 0.238 0.790 1.00 0.076 0.137
APB 1.63 ± 0.41 1.89 ± 0.45 3.74 ± 1.28 F(2, 34) = 3.050 0.093 F(1, 17) = 0.939 0.346 F(2, 34) = 1.337 0.267 1.00 0.213 0.364
FPB 1.18 ± 0.28 1.53 ± 0.37 2.41 ± 0.69 F(2, 34) = 3.439 0.073 F(1, 17) = 4.425 0.051 F(2, 34) = 1.398 0.260 0.273 0.158 0.406
EDC 1.01 ± 0.21 0.94 ± 0.12 1.75 ± 0.36 F(2, 34) = 5.960 0.016 F(1, 17) = 0.082 0.778 F(2, 34) = 0.146 0.865 1.00 0.031 0.078
FDS 0.83 ± 0.12 0.97 ± 0.18 1.60 ± 0.25 F(2, 30) = 6.345 0.005 F(1,15) = 1.090 0.313 F(2, 30) = 1.174 0.323 1.00 0.020 0.077
ECR 1.24 ± 0.20 1.62 ± 0.43 2.45 ± 0.53 F(2, 30) = 4.730 0.016 F(1, 15) = 0.319 0.580 F(2, 30) = 0.867 0.388 0.947 0.030 0.217
FCR 0.69 ± 0.11 0.99 ± 0.20 1.39 ± 0.20 F(2, 30) = 5.173 0.012 F(1, 15) = 2.079 0.170 F(2, 30) = 1.388 0.265 0.473 0.011 0.376

*Bold face implies p < 0.05.