TABLE 3.

The outcome of the two-way ANOVA for the area sizes A (in mm²⋅μV⋅10⁵) with factors of method and resolution for the intensity of 105% RMT of FCR; M1, ignoring non-MEP points, M2, removing them^*.

	⟨A⟩ at 105% RMT of FCR		Method		Resolution		Method × resolution
	M1	M2	F	p	F	p	F	p
FDI	4.81 ± 1.48	4.27 ± 1.25	F(1, 19) = 5.335	0.032	F(2, 38) = 1.655	0.212	F(2, 38) = 3.128	0.093
ADM	1.68 ± 0.50	1.50 ± 0.43	F(1, 17) = 5.158	0.036	F(2, 34) = 1.927	0.173	F(2, 34) = 2.638	0.122
APB	3.54 ± 1.12	3.25 ± 1.03	F(1, 19) = 7.967	0.011	F(2, 38) = 1.002	0.342	F(2, 38) = 3.404	0.079
FPB	2.21 ± 0.59	2.00 ± 0.53	F(1, 19) = 9.775	0.006	F(2, 38) = 1.286	0.273	F(1, 19) = 9.775	0.006
EDC	1.63 ± 0.33	1.49 ± 0.29	F(1, 19) = 19.435	0.000	F(2, 38) = 2.625	0.086	F(1, 19) = 19.435	0.000
FDS	1.40 ± 0.22	1.29 ± 0.20	F(1, 19) = 24.526	0.000	F(2, 38) = 0.582	0.517	F(2, 38) = 11.278	0.002
ECR	2.09 ± 0.43	1.93 ± 0.39	F(1, 19) = 13.025	0.002	F(2, 38) = 2.576	0.089	F(2, 38) = 5.639	0.023
FCR	1.43 ± 0.19	1.33 ± 0.17	F(1, 17) = 20.599	0.000	F(2, 34) = 0.096	0.830	F(2, 34) = 9.791	0.004

*Bold face implies p < 0.05.