Table 3.
Effect of TTO on the genes expression of GH, IGF-I, IGF-II, and MSTN of finishing pigs (n = 6).
| Treatment1 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sites | Symbol | CON | LTO | MTO | HTO | SEM | P-value |
| Liver | GH | 1.06 | 1.02 | 1.52 | 1.13 | 0.09 | 0.21 |
| IGF-I | 1.03b | 2.98a | 4.25a | 3.06a | 0.33 | 0.002 | |
| IGF-II | 1.01 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.78 | 0.05 | 0.47 | |
| MSTN | 1.02a | 0.69b | 0.73b | 0.70b | 0.47 | 0.03 | |
| LD muscle | GH | 1.02b | 1.17ab | 1.88a | 1.94a | 0.15 | 0.04 |
| IGF-I | 1.00b | 1.11b | 1.72a | 1.24b | 0.07 | <0.001 | |
| IGF-II | 1.02 | 1.29 | 1.03 | 0.98 | 0.66 | 0.36 | |
| MSTN | 1.00a | 0.72b | 0.73b | 0.74b | 0.04 | 0.007 | |
| Back fat | GH | 1.01 | 1.10 | 1.32 | 1.26 | 0.08 | 0.48 |
| IGF-I | 1.01 | 1.12 | 1.10 | 1.08 | 0.07 | 0.95 | |
| IGF-II | 1.01 | 1.04 | 1.20 | 0.96 | 0.07 | 0.70 | |
a, bMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly for treatment effect. 1CON (control), pigs receiving a control diet; LTO (low tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 100 mg/kg tea tree oil; MTO (middle tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 200 mg/kg tea tree oil; HTO (high tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 300 mg/kg tea tree oil; TTO, tea tree oil.