Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 8:1–46. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04822-0

Table 6.

The normalized decision matrix

Core criterion Alternative
A1: Beylikdüzü A2: Eyüp A3: Sarıyer A4: Ümraniye A5: Pendik
C1: Proximity to residential and urban areas 0.1967 0.1457 0.2251 0.2542 0.1783
C2: Proximity to waste collection point 0.2610 0.1753 0.1411 0.2055 0.2172
C3: Proximity to waste segregation points 0.2278 0.1746 0.1737 0.1923 0.2316
C4: Proximity to waste recovery sites 0.2204 0.1686 0.1360 0.2004 0.2746
C5: Proximity to environmentally protected zones 0.1176 0.3230 0.3230 0.1667 0.0698
C6: Traffic congestion 0.0879 0.2577 0.3596 0.2124 0.0823
C7: Soil emission 0.0662 0.2824 0.2467 0.2373 0.1674
C8: Land price 0.0837 0.2828 0.3666 0.1875 0.0794
C9: Operations and maintenance costs 0.1900 0.2150 0.2150 0.1900 0.1900
C10: Investment cost 0.1622 0.2151 0.2804 0.2048 0.1375
C11: Future expansion potential 0.2590 0.1633 0.1071 0.1579 0.3127
C12: Regional financial incentives 0.2361 0.1597 0.1597 0.1995 0.2450
C13: Flexibility 0.2747 0.1403 0.1468 0.1624 0.2758
C14: Robustness 0.2408 0.1420 0.1313 0.2040 0.2819