Table 9.
The FFYWA scores, utility degrees, utility functions, and ranks of the candidate locations
| Alternative | FFYWA score | Utility degree | Utility function | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | Second | ||||
| A0: anti-ideal | (0.4498, 0.7700) | 1.0000 | 0.3984 | – | – |
| A1: Beylikdüzü | (0.8162, 0.3819) | 2.3453 | 0.9343 | 0.8393 | 2 |
| A2: Eyüp | (0.5570, 0.6790) | 1.3551 | 0.5398 | 0.4850 | 4 |
| A3: Sarıyer | (0.4744, 0.7623) | 1.0462 | 0.4168 | 0.3744 | 5 |
| A4: Ümraniye | (0.6333, 0.5785) | 1.6713 | 0.6658 | 0.5981 | 3 |
| A5: Pendik | (0.8500, 0.4038) | 2.4403 | 0.9721 | 0.8733 | 1 |
| A6: ideal | (0.8640, 0.3738) | 2.5103 | 1.0000 | – | – |