Table 3.

Quality assessment

	Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology?	Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives?	Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect the data?	Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of the data?	Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of the results?	Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically?	Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice-versa, addressed?	Are the participants, and their voices, adequately represented?	Is the research conducted according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body?	Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data?	Score (%)	High/Medium /Low quality
Cowdell 2020 [27]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	100	High
Dal Mas 2020 [50]	Yes	Yes	unclear	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	No	Yes	60	Medium
Dent 2016 [36]	Unclear	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	70	High
Fonseka 2019 [43]	Yes	Yes	Unclear	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	No	Yes	60	Medium
Grindell 2020 [28]	Unclear	Yes	Yes	Yes	Unclear	No	Unclear	Yes	Yes	Yes	60	Medium
Heaton 2016 [29]	Unclear	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	70	High
IKT Casebook Volume 1 2019 [44]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Unclear	Unclear	No	No	Yes	Unclear	Yes	50	Medium
IKT Casebook Volume 3 2020 [45]	Unclear	Yes	Yes	NA	Unclear	No	No	Unclear	Unclear	Unclear	20	Low
Knowles 2018 [30]	Unclear	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	70	High
Law 2020 [31]	Yes	Yes	Yes	NA	NA	No	NA?	Yes	Yes	NA	50	Medium
Lewando-Hundt 2019 [32]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	80	High
Livings 2020 [37]	Unclear	Yes	Yes	NA	NA	No	No	Yes	Yes	NA	40	Low
Miller 2016 [46]	Unclear	Yes	Yes	Unclear	Yes	No	Unclear	Yes	No	Yes	50	Medium
Milton [38]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	80	High
Ospina- Pinillos 2018 [41]	Unclear	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	70	High
Ospina-Pinillos 2019 [39]	Unclear	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	70	High
Ospina-Pinillos 2020 [40]	Unclear	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Unclear	Unclear	Yes	Yes	Yes	70	High
Reeve 2016 [33]	Unclear	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Unclear	Yes	Yes	60	Medium
Revenas 2018 [48]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	80	High
Thompson 2020 [47]	Unclear	Yes	Yes	NA	NA	No	No	Yes	Yes	NA	40	Low
TK2A Casebook 2019 [34]	Unclear	Yes	Yes	Yes	NA	Yes	Yes	No	Unclear	Unclear	40	Low
Wannheden 2020 [49]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	80	High
Wolstenholme 2020 [35]	Unclear	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	70	High
Yanageneh	Unclear	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Unclear	Yes	70	High

Low scoring are either research protocols and non peer reviewed casebooks for which there were no specific quality assessment tool available to use.