Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 28;12(13):1658. doi: 10.3390/ani12131658

Table 3.

Effect of propolis (PR), bee pollen (BP), and their interaction (PR + BP) on the productive performance of broiler chickens.

Groups Traits 1
IBW (g) FBW (g) BWG (g) FI (g) FCR
PR effect −PR 755 2489 b 1734 b 154 b 1.86
+PR 745 2666 a 1920 a 165 a 1.81
n 10 10 10 10 10
SEM 7.8 16.4 8.9 2.4 0.021
p-value 0.376 <0.001 <0.001 0.003 0.095
BP effect −BP 754 2528 b 1774 b 155 b 1.84
+BP 746 2628 a 1881 a 164 a 1.83
n 10 10 10 10 10
SEM 7.8 16.4 8.9 2.4 0.021
p-value 0.476 0.001 <0.001 0.024 0.669
Interaction effect CONT 760 2421 1661 d 148 1.87
PR 749 2636 1887 b 163 1.82
BP 751 2559 1808 c 160 1.86
PR + BP 742 2697 1955 a 168 1.80
n 5 5 5 5 5
SEM 10.9 23.1 12.5 3.4 0.030
p-value 0.900 0.118 0.006 0.295 0.921

Means with dis-similar superscripts (a, b, c, d) in the same column significantly differ at p < 0.05. SEM: standard error of means. n: number of observations in the treatment group. 1 Traits: IBW, initial body weight 22 d of age; FBW, final body weight at 42 d of age; BWG, body weight gain; FI, feed intake; and FCR, feed conversion ratio.