Table 2.
Study | Patient Population | n | ctDNA Assay | ctDNA Testing Time Points | Major Findings | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tie et al., 2016 [55] |
Stage II CC | 230 | Safe-SeqS | 4–10 weeks post-op and every 3 months for 2 years |
Cohort not receiving ACT If ctDNA-+ve post-op: HR for cancer recurrence—18 (95% CI, 7.9 to 40). Cohort receiving ACT If ctDNA-+ve post-ACT: HR for recurrence—11 (95% CI, 1.8 to 68). |
ctDNA detection preceded radiologic recurrence by a median of 5.5 months. |
Reinert et al., 2019 [29] |
Stages I to III CRC | 130 | Signatera | Preop, post-op day 30, and every 3 months for up to 3 years. | HR for cancer recurrence with positive ctDNA:
|
Serial ctDNA analyses revealed disease recurrence up to 16.5 months ahead of radiologic imaging (mean, 8.7 months; range, 0.8–16.5 months). |
Tie et al., 2019 [32] |
Stage III CC | 96 | Safe-SeqS | 4–10 weeks post-op and within 6 weeks of ACT completion | HR for cancer recurrence with positive ctDNA:
|
RFS at 3 years in patients who are ctDNA-positive vs. -negative: post-op 47% vs. 76%, post-ACT 30% vs. 77%. |
Tarazona et al., 2019 [30] | Stages I to III CC | 150 | Tumor-informed ddPCR | Preop, 6–8 weeks post-op and every 4 months up to 5 years. | HR for recurrence with positive ctDNA:
|
ctDNA detection during surveillance preceded radiological recurrence by a median of 11.5 months. |
Henriksen et al., 2022 [27] | Stage III CRC | 168 | Signatera | 2–4 weeks post-op and every 3 months thereafter | Detection of ctDNA was a strong recurrence predictor post-o (HR = 7.0; 95% CI, 3.7–13.5) and immediately after ACT (HR = 50.76; 95% CI, 15.4–167). | ctDNA detected recurrence with a median lead-time of 9.8 months compared with radiologic studies. |
Parikh et al., 2021 [28] |
Stages I–IV CRC | 103 | Tumor-uninformed assay (REVEAL) |
Post-op, post-ACT, and longitudinally in some patients | HR for recurrence when +ve for ctDNA post definitive therapy and with >1 year of follow-up: 11.28. | Integrating epigenomic signatures increased sensitivity by 25–36% versus genomic alterations alone. |
Tie et al., 2019 [33] |
Locally advanced rectal carcinoma | 159 | Safe-SeqS | Pretreatment, post CRT, and 4–10 weeks after surgery. | Significantly worse RFS if ctDNA was detectable after CRT (HR, 6.6; p < 0.001) or after surgery (HR, 13.0; p < 0.001). | The estimated 3-year RFS was 33% for the post-op ctDNA-positive patients and 87% for the post-op ctDNA-negative patients. |
McDuff et al., 2021 [59] |
Locally advanced rectal carcinoma | 29 | ddPCR | Baseline, preop, and post-op | At a median follow-up of 20 months, patients with detectable post-op ctDNA experienced poorer RFS (HR, 11.56; p = 0.007). | All patients (4 of 4) with detectable post-op ctDNA recurred, whereas only 2 of 15 patients with undetectable ctDNA recurred (negative predictive value = 87%). |
Tie et al., 2021 [60] |
CRC with liver metastasis | 54 | Safe-SeqS | Preop and post-op samples, serial samples during pre- or post-op chemotherapy, and follow-up | Detectable post-op ctDNA predicted a significantly lower RFS (HR, 6.3; 95% CI, 2.58 to 15.2; p < 0.001) and OS (HR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.5 to 11.8; p < 0.001) | End-of-treatment (surgery +/− ACT) ctDNA detection was associated with a 5-year RFS of 0% compared to 75.6% for patients with an undetectable end-of-treatment ctDNA (HR, 14.9; 95% CI, 4.94 to 44.7; p < 0.001). |
Loupakis et al., 2021 [61] |
CRC undergoing liver resection | 112 | Signatera | Post-op, at the time of radiologic relapse or last follow-up. | ctDNA-positive status was also associated with an inferior overall survival: HR: 16.0; 95% CI, 3.9 to 68.0; p < 0.001. | ctDNA was detectable in the post-op sample in 54.4% (61 of 112) of patients, of which 96.7% (59 of 61) progressed at the time of data cutoff (HR: 5.8; 95% CI, 3.5 to 9.7; p < 0.001). |
Kotaka et al., 2022 (Galaxy study) [62] |
Stages I–IV CRC patients | 1365 | Signatera | Before surgery, 1-month post-op and every 3 months thereafter for 2 years | Six-month DFS rate was significantly higher in patients whose ctDNA was converted with ACT compared to patients who remained positive after ACT with an HR of 52.3 (95% CI: 7.2–380.5; p < 0.001), after a median follow-up of 6.6 months. | Cumulative incidence of ctDNA clearance was significantly higher with ACT vs. non-ACT (67% vs. 7% by 24 weeks; cumulative HR = 17.1; 95% CI: 6.7–43.4, p < 0.001). |
Tie et al., 2022 (DYNAMIC) [63] |
Stage II CC | 455 | SafeSeqS | 4 and 7 weeks post-surgery | Adjuvant therapy guided by ctDNA resulted in chemotherapy administration in lower proportion of patients without any detriment to 2-year RFS. | DYNAMIC is the first reported prospective randomized study supporting the ctDNA-guided adjuvant therapy approach in stage II colon cancer. |
Abbreviations: CC, colon cancer; n, number of patients; Preop, preoperative; Post-op, postoperative; Post-ACT, after adjuvant chemotherapy; ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA; Safe-SeqS, safe sequencing system; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; MRD, minimal residual disease; CRC, colorectal cancer; RFS, relapse-free survival; ddPCR, digital droplet polymerase chain reaction; NGS, next-generation sequencing; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; DFS, disease-free survival.