Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 24;19(13):7786. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137786

Table 3.

The factors associated with dissatisfaction with online classes among the overall study population.

Factors Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Gender
Male Ref. Ref.
Female 1.76 (1.17, 2.64) 1.82 (1.19, 2.80)
Assessment at the end of each class
Yes Ref. Ref.
No 1.65 (1.10, 2.47) 1.08 (0.69, 1.67)
OLMS (availability of online LMS or institutional website)
Yes Ref. Ref.
No 2.75 (1.86, 4.07) 1.97 (1.14, 3.41)
All key information about the course is available in OLMS
Yes Ref. Ref.
No 2.46 (1.67, 3.63) 0.94 (0.53, 1.65)
Assistance with overcoming obstacles to accessing classes or materials
Yes Ref. Ref.
No 3.17 (2.13, 4.73) 1.78 (1.12, 2.80)
Time allotted for online classes sufficient?
Yes Ref. Ref.
No 3.35 (2.13, 5.29) 2.11 (1.28, 3.46)
Interaction with teacher (during + after class)
Yes Ref. Ref.
No 2.79 (1.83, 4.24) 1.62 (1.02, 2.59)
Model performance test
McFadden’s R2: 0.074
Goodness-of-fit test statistic (p-value): 139.31 (0.97)
Link test: 1.94 ***
Area under the ROC curve: 0.7241

Note: Estimates are derived from the logistic regression model. Adjusted effect estimates are adjusted for each of the other variables simultaneously. OR, odds ratio; OLMS, online learning management system. *** (p < 0.001).