Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 25;19(13):7820. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137820

Table 3.

Summary of risk of bias ratings assigned to the studies.

Domain Eguchi et al. [39] Gravel et al. [40] Guo et al. [41] Guo et al. [42] Julander et al. [43] Lv et al. [44] Wang et al. [45] Xu et al. [46] Xu et al. [47] Xu et al. [48] Yu et al. [49] Zheng et al. [50] Zheng et al. [51] Guo et al. [52] Yu et al. [53] Li et al. [54] Wu et al. [55] Xu et al. [56] Xu et al. [57]
Study
group
representation
Knowledge of group assignments
Exposure assessment methods
Outcome assessment methods

Confounding
 
Incomplete
outcome
data
Selective outcome reporting
Financial
conflict
of interest

Other
 

Note: green—low risk of bias, blue—probably low risk of bias, amber—probably high risk of bias, and red—high risk of bias.