Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 30;19(13):8024. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138024

Table 1.

Relationship between risk factors and aspects correlated with caries experience (N = 30): Socioeconomic factors (SE), Cerebral Palsy Subtype (CPS), Demographics (D), Condition of Oral Cavity (OC), Dental Habits (DH) and Nutrition and Diet (ND).

Reference Risk Factors Aspects Significantly Correlated with Caries Experience Aspects Not Significantly Correlated with Caries Experience Country Population Characteristics Study Type Risk of Bias
Santos et al. 2009 [6] ND, OC, D Low oral motor control
Liquid diet
Sugar intake
Age
- Brazil 108 children 4–19 y in rehabilitation Cross-sectional Fair
De Carvalho et al. 2011 [10] CPS, DH Dental health habits of caregiver Subtype of spastic CP Brazil 52 children 7–18 y in rehabilitation Cross-sectional Good
De Camargo & Antunes 2008 [11] SE, CPS, ND Low caregiver education
Crowded household
Sugar intake
Domestic income
Subtype of spastic CP
Diet consistency
Brazil 200 institutionalised children 2–17 y Cross-sectional Fair—high subject dropout rate noted
Santos & Nogueira 2005 [13] CPS, OC Subtype of spastic CP (hemiplegic children and adolescents with CP had less caries)
Biting reflex
- Brazil 124 non-institutionalised children 3–17 y Cross-sectional Fair
Sinha et al. 2015 [14] DH Low tooth brushing frequency
Dental visit frequency
- India 100 children, 50 with CP and 50 non-CP Case control Fair
Moreira et al. 2012 [15] SE, CPS Low intellectual ability Domestic income Brazil 165 children from rehabilitation centre, special school and public school Cross-sectional Good
Dourado et al. 2013 [16] SE, CPS Low intellectual ability Domestic income Brazil 76 CP children from rehabilitation centre compared to 89 without impairment Case control Good
Liu et al. 2014 [17] SE, D, DH, ND Sex
Low tooth brushing frequency
Domestic income
Snacking frequency
China 477 children from special education schools 12–17y Cross-sectional Fair
Cardoso et al. 2014 [18] SE, CPS, DH, ND Low caregiver education
Neurological CP classification (spastic)
Domestic income
Tooth brushing frequency
Dental visit frequency
Diet consistency
Snacking frequency
Brazil 97 children 2–18 y from reference centre for CP children Cross-sectional Good
Hartwig et al. 2016 [19] SE Low domestic income
Low caregiver education
- Brazil Records from university dental clinic, 7 mth–12 y Cross-sectional Poor – data obtained from dental records
Subasi et al. 2007 [20] SE, DH Low caregiver education
Dental habits of mother
Dental visits
- Turkey 35 children 3-12 y Cross-sectional Fair
De Camargo et al. 2011 [21] SE, ND Sugar intake
>1 sibling
Low caregiver education
- Brazil 200 children 2–17 y from non-government organisation Longitudinal Good
Chu & Lo 2010 [22] CPS - Subtype of spastic CP Hong Kong 65 children from special schools Cross-sectional Fair
Diniz et al. 2015 [23] CPS, D Age Subtype of spastic CP
Sex
Brazil 181 non-institutionalised children in oral health program, 4–12 y Cross-sectional Fair
Akhter et al. 2017 [24] CPS, D, DH Subtype of spastic CP (quadriplegia)
High motor dysfunction (GMFCS IV-V)
Age
Low tooth brushing frequency
- Bangladesh 90 children from CP register, 2–17 y Cross-sectional Fair
Bourke & Jago 1983 [25] CPS Neurological CP classification (spastic) - Australia 100 parents with CP attending centre Cross-sectional Fair
Sedky 2018 [26] CPS, D, OC, DH Subtype of spastic CP (quadriplegia)
High motor dysfunction (GMFCS IV-V)
Age
Drooling
Low tooth brushing frequency
- Egypt 62 children 3–12 y in hospital Cross-sectional Good
Huang et al. 2010 [27] CPS, D Low intellectual ability
Age
Sex Taiwan 345 institutionalised children under 18 y Cross-sectional Good
Santos et al. 2014 [28] CPS, D, OC Low general motor ability
Low oral motor control
Low salivary flow rate
High salivary osmolality
Age Brazil 65 children 6–13 y spastic CP in rehabilitation centre Cross-sectional Fair
Dwizak et al. 2017 [29] CPS Physical disability - Germany 1283 children 6–16 y Cross-sectional Fair
Roberto et al. 2012 [30] D, ND Age Sugar intake Brazil 266 dental records 1–5 y Cross-sectional Poor – data obtained from dental records
Wyne et al. 2017 [31] D Age - Saudi Arabia 52 children Cross-sectional Poor – participant bias from survey
Gimenez-Prats et al. 2003 [32] D - Sex Spain 103 children 5–20 y in hospital Cross-sectional Fair
De Castilho et al. 2017 [33] OC Less bruxism and dental attrition - Brazil 171 records of female children 1–13 y Cross-sectional Fair
Subramaniam et al. 2014 [34] OC Low salivary antioxidant capacity
Low salivary pH
- India 34 non-institutionalised children 7–12 y vs. 33 matched healthy children Case control Good
Subramaniam et al. 2010 [35] OC Low salivary pH - India 100 non-institutionalised children 5–12 y vs. 100 matched healthy children Case control Good
Hegde et al. 2008 [36] OC - Drooling India 113 children 5–18 y attending special schools Cross-sectional Fair
Ruiz et al. 2018 [37] OC - Salivary osmolality Brazil 52 CP children in rehabilitation vs. 52 healthy children, 4–20 y Case control Good
Storhaug 1985 [38] ND Sugar intake Sweetened medication Norway 436 children 1–6 y attending health centre Cross-sectional Fair
Grzic et al. 2011 [39] ND - Diet consistency Croatia 43 institutionalised children 7–16 y vs. 43 matched healthy children Case control Good