Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 23;19(13):7711. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137711

Table 1.

Risk of bias assessment of included studies.

Study RAND ALLO BLPP BLOA INCDAT SELREP OTBI
Steinhauser et al., 2008 [16] ? ? HIGH LOW LOW LOW LOW
Ando et al., 2010 [22] LOW LOW HIGH LOW ? LOW LOW
Do Carmo et al., 2017 [23] LOW LOW HIGH LOW ? LOW LOW
Juliao et al., 2014 [24] LOW LOW HIGH LOW ? LOW LOW
Kwan et al., 2019 [25] LOW LOW LOW LOW ? LOW HIGH
Savard et al., 2006 [26] LOW LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW
NG et al., 2016 [27] ? ? HIGH ? ? LOW LOW
Warth et al., 2020 [28] LOW LOW HIGH HIGH LOW LOW LOW
Rodin et al., 2019 [32] LOW LOW HIGH ? LOW LOW LOW

Note. RAND: random sequence generation; ALLO: allocation concealment; BLPP: blinding of participants and personnel; BLOA: blinding of outcome assessment; INCDAT: incomplete data; SELREP: selective reporting; OTBI: other bias. HIGH: high bias of reporting; LOW: low bias of reporting; ?: no information provided.