Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 28;11(13):1918. doi: 10.3390/foods11131918

Table 5.

Mean values per cluster of the different items or constructs assessed in the questionnaire and label reading percentages for the participants who followed a diet.

Mean Value
Cluster 1
(n = 86)
Cluster 2
(n = 90)
Cluster 3
(n = 70)
Cluster 4
(n = 52)
NK 10.8 b 13.3 a 12.9 a 10.9 b
ATFL 4.7 4.5 4.4 4.4
NR.1 2.6 c 4.8 a 4.0 b 3.7 b
NR.2 3.1 a 1.8 b 2.6 a 2.9 a
NR.3 3.3 a 1.8 b 2.1 b 2.3 b
NR.4 2.9 a 1.8 c 2.2 bc 2.9 ab
NR.5 3.2 a 2.0 b 2.9 a 3.1 a
NR.6 3.0 a 2.3 b 3.1 a 3.6 a
NR.7 3.2 a 2.4 b 3.4 a 3.1 a
NR.8 2.6 c 2.2 c 4.8 a 3.3 b
NR.9 2.7 b 1.9 c 2.3 bc 4.6 a
FCQ Health 5.8 b 6.2 a 6.2 a 5.6 b
FCQ Mood 5.6 ab 6.0 a 6.0 a 5.4 b
FCQ Easy 5.1 5.1 5.3 4.9
FCQ Proximity 5.5 bc 5.9 ab 6.0 a 5.3 c
FCQ Sensory appeal 5.7 b 5.9 ab 6.1 a 5.5 b
FCQ Natural content 5.4 ab 5.8 a 5.8 a 5.0 b
FCQ Cheap 4.0 ab 3.5 b 4.1 ab 4.3 a
FCQ Value for money 5.6 b 5.8 ab 6.1 a 5.4 b
FCQ Weight control 5.4 a 5.4 a 5.7 a 4.8 b
FCQ Familiarity 5.2 5.2 5.2 4.8
Fiber impact 20.9 17.6 18.2 17.9
Sugar impact 23.5 b 26.8 a 23.8 ab 22.6 b
Saturated fats impact 23.7 24.8 22.6 22.8
Salt impact 20.9 18.4 18.5 17.3
Mineral impact 18.6 a 13.9 b 14.9 b 15.6 ab
Carbohydrates impact 21.7 21.7 18.7 18.8
Cholesterol impact 22.5 a 19.3 ab 20.4 ab 18.2 b
Total fat impact 24.1 24.1 22.8 21.3
Protein impact 20.5 20.9 18.0 18.3
Caloric impact 23.6 24.7 23.6 21.8
Vitamin impact 19.2 a 13.9 b 15.9 ab 15.6 ab
* Occasional reading 4.7% 3.3% 2.9% 7.7%
* Frequent reading 68.6 ab% 77.8 a% 68.6 ab% 53.8 b%

a–c: Different letters in the same row and sociodemographic variables (sex, age group, and education level) or BMI indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). NK: Nutrition knowledge; ATFL: Attitude Toward Food Labels; NR: Reasons for Never Reading the Nutrition Information; FCQ: Food Choice Questionnaire. * The first item of Label-Reading Behavior: occasional reading (options: never and rarely) and frequent reading (options: often and always).