Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 28;11(13):2050. doi: 10.3390/cells11132050

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models evaluating the influence of stromal (ST) or intra-tumoral (IT) of CD8, FoxP3, and CD68 on RFS and OS. Zero and one are related to the cutoff.

Univariate Analysis Relapse-Free Survival Overall Survival
p-Value HR (95% CI) p-Value HR (95% CI)
CD8 ST 0-1 $ 0.958 0.98 (0.48–2.02) 0.026 # 3.19 (1.15–8.90)
CD8 IT 1-0 0.011 3.73 (1.35–10.31) 0.025 3.20 (1.16–8.84)
FoxP3 ST 1-0 0.002 1.97 (1.28–3.04) 0.002 1.95 (1.29–2.96)
FoxP3 IT 1-0 0.008 1.84 (1.17–2.87) 0.001 2.16 (1.36–3.41)
CD68 ST 1-0 0.206 1.56 (0.78–3.11) 0.076 2.12 (0.93–4.85)
CD68 IT 0-1 0.004 1.86 (1.21–2.85) 0.005 1.79 (1.19–2.69)
Multivariate Analysis Relapse-Free Survival Overall Survival
p-Value HR (95% CI) p-Value HR (95% CI)
CD8 ST 0-1 0.847 1.10 (0.43–2.78) 0.028 5.03 (1.19–21.31)
CD8 IT 1-0 0.024 3.36 (1.17–9.67) 0.038 3.08 (1.06–8.94)
FoxP3 ST 1-0 0.255 1.87 (0.64–5.49) 0.147 2.46 (0.73–8.28)
FoxP3 IT 1-0 0.056 1.88 (0.98–3.57) 0.109 1.63 (0.90–2.98)
CD68 ST 1-0 0.13 1.63 (0.86–3.09) 0.961 1.02 (0.56–1.83)
CD68 IT 0-1 0.6 1.22 (0.58–2.55) 0.080 1.98 (0.92–4.27)

$ Zero and one are groups related to the cut-offs (see Figure 3 and Figure 4). # Bold p-values indicated significant correlations (Cox regression).