Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 5;19(13):8202. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138202

Table 2.

The gully index of Tutujiliangzi and the optimum-fit functions.

Gully Number A
(m2)
L
(m)
N H(N) Morphology of Longitudinal Profile Linear Function
(R2)
Exponential Function
(R2)
Logarithm Function
(R2)
Power Function
(R2)
T1 16.37 134.71 1.147 0.230 concave 0.983 0.962 0.944 0.995 *
T2 111.17 898.51 1.075 0.212 concave 0.732 0.803 0.477 0.916 *
T3 18.77 154.93 2.384 0.515 concave 0.815 0.636 0.881 * 0.740
T4 30.76 249.00 0.592 0.093 knickpoint 0.406 * 0.298 * 0.283 0.203
T5 18.74 145.47 0.462 0.064 knickpoint 0.989 * 0.996 * 0.977 0.987
T6 10.67 119.46 2.148 0.464 concave 0.964 0.954 0.854 0.999 *
T7 118.44 969.61 1.255 0.257 concave 0.884 0.868 0.733 0.972 *
T8 73.59 616.76 1.309 0.270 concave 0.823 0.933 * 0.671 0.944 *
T9 20.54 171.94 1.491 0.314 concave 0.942 0.992 * 0.846 0.978
T10 30.48 259.75 1.375 0.286 concave 0.999 * 0.989 0.985 0.999 *
T11 25.96 228.24 1.445 0.303 concave 0.970 0.831 0.996 * 0.967
T12 62.45 505.19 1.190 0.240 concave 0.790 0.934 * 0.624 0.856
T13 22.67 190.2 0.700 0.118 convex 0.739 * 0.634 0.529 0.433
T14 15.59 131.33 1.605 0.341 concave 0.998 0.975 0.969 0.999 *
T15 28.24 228.44 1.005 0.194 concave 0.880 0.967 * 0.682 0.905
T16 31.68 254.65 1.865 0.402 concave 0.962 0.971 0.835 0.996 *
T17 23.33 190.72 0.700 0.118 convex 0.423 0.441 * 0.246 0.271
T18 61.80 511.65 1.576 0.335 concave 0.711 0.924 * 0.508 0.920
T19 35.10 301.38 1.543 0.327 concave 0.761 0.898 0.602 0.910 *
T20 34.45 279.67 1.752 0.376 concave 0.925 0.996 * 0.786 0.976
T21 39.34 322.58 1.607 0.342 concave 0.880 0.984 * 0.801 0.945
T22 22.87 184.58 1.024 0.199 concave 0.959 0.981 * 0.853 0.921
T23 25.61 207.11 1.278 0.262 concave 0.954 0.998 * 0.879 0.971
T24 28.76 230.68 1.600 0.340 concave 0.881 0.951 * 0.824 0.911
T25 12.21 100.58 1.287 0.364 concave 0.999 * 0.928 0.970 0.993
Average 36.78 303.49 1.337 0.279

“*” represents optimum-fit functions of longitudinal profile.