Table IV.
Pooled PPV
| Studies | Positive predictive value (PPV) (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IgM | IgG | IgM or IgG | IgM and IgG | |
| Bisoffi et al.21 | 54.22 (48.43–59.90) | 66.67 (59.86–72.84) | ||
| Andrey et al.22 | 97.50 (93.19–97.79) | 97.37 (94.36–98.79) | ||
| Nicol et al.12 | 94.26 (88.81–97.14) | 97.35 (92.26–99.12) | 94.26 (88.81–97.14) | |
| Pérez-García et al.13 | 100 (87.10–100) | 100 (93.40–100) | 100 (93.80–100) | |
| Elslande et al.8 | 94.15 (92.09–95.69) | 96.53 (94.97–97.62) | 93.33 (91.52–94.77) | 98.67 (97.26–99.36) |
| Serre-Miranda et al.23 | 98.25 (96.44–99.15) | 98.51 (96.79–99.32) | 97.55 (95.46–98.69) | 98.39 (93.96–99.58) |
| Pan et al.6 | 85.71 (76.99–91.50) | 78.33 (70.84–84.33) | 80.82 (74.87–85.63) | |
| Whitman et al.9 | 92.50 (90.50–94.11) | 96.62 (95.01–97.73) | 93.09 (91.34–94.51) | |
| Xiang et al.24 | 100 (93.10–100) | 100 (95.10–100) | 100 (95.10–100) | |
| Haymond et al.10 | 96.43 (80.03–99.45) | 89.58 (80.79–94.62) | ||
| Candel González et al.19 | 100 (87.10–100) | 100 (90.10–100) | 100 (90.10–100) | 100 (87.10–100) |
| Li et al.25 | 96.76 (94.42–98.13) | 99.29 (97.25–99.82) | 96.70 (94.47–98.05) | 99.61 (97.32–99.94) |
| Hoffman et al.26 | 100 (83.90–100) | 96.43 (79.27–99.48) | ||
| Montesinos et al.27 | 98.76 (96.26–99.59) | 98.75 (96.24–99.59) | 98.91 (96.70–99.64) | |
| Wu et al.28 | 100 (97.20–100) | 100 (98.10–100) | 100 (98.70–100) | |
| Lou et al.18 | 94.67 (87.02–97.92) | 98.57 (90.69–99.80) | 88.64 (80.97–93.46) | |
| Almeida et al.20 | 91.33 (87.03–94.29) | 96.72 (93.08–98.48) | 90.18 (86.19–93.11) | 100 (94.70–100) |
| Dortet et al.29 | 100 (97.20–100) | 100 (97–100) | 100 (97.20–100) | |
| Vauloup-Fellous et al.30 | 94.16 (93.11–95.06) | 95.58 (94.64–96.36) | 94.24 (93.37–95) | |
| Garrod et al.17 | 95.40 (92.74–97.12) | 97.98 (96.06–98.97) | 95.53 (92.97–97.19) | |
| Maya et al.15 | 100 (85.70–100) | |||
| Adams et al.31 | 93.10 (88.86–95.81) | |||
| Pellanda et al.5 | 96.97 (88.98–99.22) | |||
| Choe et al.32 | 95.59 (87.70–98.50) | 100 (92.30–100) | ||
| Shen et al.7 | 97.18 (89.80–99.27) | |||
| Vidal-Anzardo et al.33 | 24.14 (13.85–38.63) | |||
| Sisay et al.34 | 92.08 (87.75–94.97) | |||
| Chan et al.11 | 98.90 (92.80–99.84) | |||
| Kızıloglu et al.35 | 71.93 (60.97–80.78) | |||
| Ying et al.3 | 90.59 (83.17–94.94) | |||
| Dellière et al.36 | 100 (96.30–100) | |||
| Carozzi et al.37 | 66.54 (62.07–70.73) | |||
| Pallett et al.38 | 97.24 (94.45–98.65) | |||
| Total | 93.45 (92.83–94.03) | 95.97 (95.47–96.42) | 94.09 (93.39–94.73) | 94.15 (93.52–94.73) |