Table 6.
Comparison of primary calibrators by ADx Nf-L ELISA and UmanDiagnostics Nf-L ELISA in 14 unclassified CSF samples.
| Dunn’s Multiple Comparisons Test | ADx Nf-L ELISA | UmanDiagnostics Nf-L ELISA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significance | p-Value | Significance | p-Value | |
| Uman bNf-L vs. P-rhNf-L | *** | 0.0002 | **** | <0.0001 |
| Uman bNf-L vs. bNf-L | ns | >0.9999 | ns | >0.9999 |
| Uman bNf-L vs. E-rhNF-L | ns | >0.9999 | ns | 0.4188 |
| P-rhNf-L vs. bNf-L | ** | 0.001 | ** | 0.0012 |
| P-rhNf-L vs. E-rhNf-L | **** | <0.0001 | * | 0.0179 |
| bNf-L vs. E-rhNf-L | ns | >0.9999 | ns | >0.9999 |
Analysis was performed on GraphPad Prism v.6.07 using Kruskal–Wallis’ one way ANOVA and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test for non-parametric datasets. The greater the number of stars (*), higher the significance (On GraphPad Prism, *: p ≤ 0.05; **: p ≤ 0.01; ***: p ≤ 0.001; ****: p ≤ 0.0001); ns: not significant).