Skip to main content
. 2001 Feb;67(2):956–960. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.2.956-960.2001

TABLE 1.

Inhibition and lipid analysis (percent dry weight) of selected fungi

Fungus % Inhibition of:
% Dry wt of d:
S/P ratiod Δ/molde
Growthab Germinationac Total lipids Sterols Phospholipids
P. rugulosa 8.0 a 4.7 a 38.7 d 7.2 c 9.6 cd 1.4 c 0.9 a
I. bolleyi 32.3 b 9.0 a 36.1 d 6.5 c 9.1 cd 1.3 c 1.7 c
C. cucumerinum 46.8 c 60.9 b 17.6 b 2.1 b 5.3 a 0.7 b 1.1 b
B. cinerea 47.5 c 58.0 b 12.1 a 3.2 b 7.4 abc 0.8 b 1.6 c
S. fuliginea ND 92.5 c 25.6 c 3.4 b 10.8 d 0.6 b 1.7 c
P. infestans 64.9 d ND 25.4 c 0.0 a 8.7 bcd 0.0 a 0.9 a
P. aphanidermatum 66.8 d ND 25.6 c 0.0 a 6.6 ab 0.0 a 0.8 a
a

Within a column, means with same letter are not significantly different based on Fisher's protected LSD (P = 0.05). ND, not determined. 

b

Inhibition expressed as a percentage of the reduction of mycelial dry weight of 3-day-old liquid cultures in the presence of CHDA (0.15 mg/ml) relative to the untreated control. 

c

Inhibition expressed as a percentage of the reduction of conidial germination following a 24-h incubation period with CHDA (0.15 mg/ml) relative to the untreated control. 

d

Within a column, means with same letter are not significantly different based on Fisher's protected LSD (P = 0.01). 

e

Δ/mol = [% 18:1 + 2(% 18:2) + 3(% 18:3)]/100.