Table 3.
Results of the binary-logistic regression analyses for the cross-sectional prediction of a current comorbid mental disorder in the total sample including (i) pelvic-pain-related predictor variables or (ii) psychosocial predictor variables.
| Variable | B (Std.-Error) 1 | p-Value | aOR 1 | 95%-CI 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model i) pelvic pain 2 | ||||
| Pelvic pain days per month | −0.01 (0.04) | 0.737 | 0.99 | 0.92–1.06 |
| PC_intensity 3 | −0.43 (0.67) | 0.522 | 0.65 | 0.18–2.42 |
| PC_painrelief 4 | 1.41 (0.63) | 0.026 | 4.08 | 1.19–14.04 |
| Constant | −0.49 (0.57) | 0.394 | 0.61 | |
| Model ii) psychosocial 5 | ||||
| Childhood maltreatment CM 6 | −0.14 (0.47) | 0.768 | 0.87 | 0.35–2.19 |
| Former mental disorder | 0.84 (0.47) | 0.073 | 2.31 | 0.92–5.78 |
| Any sexual dysfunction | 0.99 (0.46) | 0.031 | 2.69 | 1.09–6.64 |
| Constant | −1.49 (0.47) | 0.001 | 0.23 |
1 B = unstandardized beta coefficient, Std. Error = standard error of the unstandardized beta coefficient, aOR = adjusted odds ratio, 95%-CI = 95% confidence interval. 2 n = 90, Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.201; model i: χ2 (3) = 14.27, p = 0.003; Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2 (8) = 8.69, p = 0.369. 3 PC_intensity = principal component for the pelvic pain intensity. 4 PC_painrelief = principal component resembling the need for pain relief. 5 n = 92, Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.113; model ii: χ2 (3) = 7.89, p = 0.048; Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2 (6) = 8.10, p = 0.231. 6 Childhood maltreatment CM = any CM without the subscales physical neglect and trivialization.