Table 1.
Comparison of the runtime for different methods to construct SCBs. The reported runtime is the average over 1000 calls to construct a SCB for a sample of size N = 50 from Model A in 1D and Model C in 2D.
tGKF | ffscb | Boots-t | gMult-t | rMult-t | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model A (1D) | 4.2 s | 115.2 s | 88.4 s | 86.6 s | 83.9 s |
Model C (2D) | 92.8 s | - | 2039.6 s | 1858.4 s | 1864.9 s |