Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 23;11(13):1659. doi: 10.3390/plants11131659

Table 1.

The concentration nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) of sage in different irrigation regimes and fertilizer sources.

Treatments Nitrogen (g kg−1) Phosphorus (g kg−1) Potassium (g kg−1)
MAD25 Control 23.17 g 1.74 d,e 22.55 f
TiO2 28.40 b 1.97 b 25.22 d
AMF 27.91 c 2.02 b 27.24 b
TiO2 + AMF 29.88 a 2.20 a 29.73 a
MAD50 Control 23.57 f 1.58 h 22.09 g,h
TiO2 24.16 e 1.69 e,f 22.36 f,g
AMF 23.97 e 1.83 c 26.86 c
TiO2 + AMF 24.95 d 1.79 c,d 23.92 e
MAD75 Control 21.01 i 1.47 i 19.60 j
TiO2 21.80 h 1.59 g,h 20.39 i
AMF 21.80 h 1.65 f,g 20.66 i
TiO2 + AMF 21.71 h 1.57 h 21.90 h
LSD0.05 0.3016 0.0614 0.3285
Significance Significance levels
Year (Y) ns ns ns
Irrigation regimes (W) ** * **
Y × W ns ns ns
Fertilization (F) ** ** **
W × F ** ** **
Y × F ns ns ns
W × F × Y ns ns ns

MAD25, MAD50, and MAD75 indicating non-stressed, moderate, and severe drought stress, respectively. AMF: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; TiO2: titanium dioxide nanoparticle. Ns, *, and ** indicate no significant difference, significant at 5% probability level, and significant at 1% probability level, respectively. Different letters indicate significant differences at the 5% level according to LSD test.