Table 8.
Author and Year | Mean Microhardness for Conventional Resin (Kgf/mm2/KHN) | Mean Microhardness for CAD/CAM Milled Resin (Kgf/mm2/KHN) | Mean Microhardness for 3D-Printed Resin (Kgf/mm2/KHN) | Surface Treatment/Exposure Agent/Ageing Technique | Testing Machine Used | Authors Suggestions/Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Simoneti et al., 2022 [53] |
Vickers microhardness (A) Acrylic resin: 14.2 ± 2.6 Kgf/mm2 (B) Bis-acryl resin: 10.7 ± 2.2 Kgf/mm2 |
NA | Vickers microhardness (C) SLA resin 8.4 ± 0.2 Kgf/mm2 (D) SLS resin 10.3 ± 1.0 Kgf/mm2 |
Polished specimens | Microdurometer (FM-700; Future-Tech Corp.). |
Microhardness: Conventional Acrylics > Conventional Bisacrylic > 3D-printed PMMA > 3D-printed methacrylates |
Revilla-León et al., 2021 [49] | Knoop hardness (A) Protemp 4: 4.92 ± 0.36 KHN (B) Anaxdent new outline dentin: 13.35 ± 5.84 |
N/A | Knoop hardness (C) FreePrint temp: 12.55 ± 2.93 KHN(D) E-Dent 400 C&B MFH: 13.03 ± 3.29 KHN (E) NextDent C&B MFH: 9.91 ± 3.71 (F) Med620 VEROGlaze: 13.45 ± 2.93 |
N/M | Microhardness tester (MMT-X7, Matsuzawa) |
|
Digholkar et al., 2016 [33] | Knoop hardness (A) heat activated PMMA: 27.36 ± 0.535 KHN |
Knoop hardness (B) Ceramill TEMP: 25.33 ± 0.900 KHN |
Knoop hardness (C) E-Dent 100: 32.77 ± 1.361 KHN |
N/M | Microhardness tester (Reichert Austria) |
3D-printed Microhybrid filled composite >Conventional heat activated PMMA >CAD/CAM milled PMMA |
Crenn et al., 2022 [29] | Vickers Microhardness (A) Integrity: 27.3 ± 1.8 HV (B) Unifast: 18.4 ± 1.2 HV |
N/A | Vickers Microhardness (C) PLA Bio source: 17.5 ± 0.7 HV (D) Temporary CB: 28.9 ± 2.9 HV |
Polished specimens | Vickers Microhardness tester (MH3, Mekton, Turkey) |
3D-printed SLA > Conventional Bisacrylic > conventional Methylmethacrylate > 3D-Printed FDM |
N/A: Not Applicable; SLA, stereo lithography; SLS, selective laser sintering; N/M: Not Mentioned.