Table 12.
Elastic Modulus Results.
| Author and Year | Mean Elastic Modulus of Conventional Resin (Mpa) | Mean Elastic Modulus for CAD/CAM Milled Resin (MPa) | Mean Elastic Modulus for 3D-Printed Resin (MPa) | Exposure Agent/Aging Technique | Testing Machine Used | Authors Suggestions/Conclusions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tahayeri et al., 2018 [37] | (A) Jet ~1500 (B) Integrity ~2700 |
N/A | (C) NextDent C&B resin ~1700 | N/M | Universal testing machine | Elastic Modulus: Conventionally fabricated bis-acrylic > 3D-printed PMMA > conventionally fabricated PMMA |
| Simoneti et al., 2022 [53] | (A) Decor Acrylic resin: 859.4 ± 46.3 (B) Yprov Bisacryl: 997.3 ±108.5 |
N/A | (C) PA2201 (SLS resin): 452.4 ± 35.8 (D) Gray Resin (SAL resin): 513.3 ± 29.7 |
Mechanical fatigue simulation: 120,000 cycles, Simulating 6 months of clinical use |
Universal testing machine |
Elastic Modulus: Conventionally fabricated PMMA and bis-acrylic > 3D-printed PMMA |
| Crenn et al., 2022 [29] | (A) Integrity: 3977 ± 878.2 (B) Unifast: 2382 ± 225.8 |
N/A | (C) PLA Bio source: 3784 ± 98.9 (D) Temporary CB: 4607 ± 213.8 |
Storage at ambient temperature for 1 week | Universal testing machine |
Elastic Modulus: 3D-printed esters > Conventional bis-acrylic > 3D-Printed poly lactic > Conventional MMA. |
N/A: Not Available; N/M: Not Mentioned.