Table 13.
Author and Year | Toughness for Conventional Resin | Toughness for CAD/CAM Milled Resin | Toughness for 3D-Printed Resin | Exposure Agent/Aging Technique | Testing Machine Used | Authors Suggestions/Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tas¸ın et al., 2022 [30] | Median in MJ/m3 (A) Temdent Classic (PMMA) Thermocycling: (i) 0 cycles: 1.82 (ii) 2500 cycles: 1.31 (iii) 10,000 cycles: 0.96 (B) Protemp (Bis-Acryl) Thermocycling: (i) 0 cycles: 2.47 (ii) 2500 cycles: 2.47 (iii) 10,000 cycles: 1.54 |
Median in MJ/m3 (C) Duo Cad (PMMA): Thermocycling: (i) 0 cycles: 4.93 (ii) 2500 cycles: 4.59 (iii) 10,000 cycles: 3.70 |
Median in MJ/m3 (D) Temporis (composite resin): Thermocycling: (i) 0 cycles: 3.63 (ii) 2500 cycles: 3.09 (iii) 10,000 cycles: 2.20 |
Thermocycling | Universal testing machine | Toughness after thermocycling 10,000 cycles: CAD/CAM Milled PMMA > 3D-printed composite resin > conventional Bis-acrylic > conventional PMMA |