Table 14.
Author and Year | Mean Peak Stress for Conventional Resin | Mean Peak Stress for CAD/CAM Milled Resin | Mean Peak Stress for 3D-printed Resin | Exposure Agent/Aging Technique | Testing Machine Used | Authors Suggestions/Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tahayeri et al., 2018 [37] | (A) Jet: ≅65 MPa (B) Integrity: ≅90 MPa |
N/A | (C) NextDent C&B resin: ≅95 MPa | N/M | Universal testing machine | Peak stress: 3D-printed NextDent > Conventionally fabricated Integrity > conventionally fabricated Jet |
Simoneti et al., 2022 [53] | (A) Dencor (PMMA): 114.6 ± 14.6 N (B) Yprov Bisacryl (Bis-acryl resin) 131.1 ± 2.2 N |
N/A | (C) PA 2201 (SLS resin): 133.7 ± 4.4 N (D) Gray Resin (SLA resin): 58.7 ± 2.2 N |
Mechanical fatigue simulation: 120,000 cycles simulating 6 months of clinical use | Universal testing machine |
Peak stress: 3D-Printed SLS > Conventional Bisacrylic > conventional PMMA > 3D-Printed SLA |
N/A: Not Applicable; N/M: Not Mentioned.