Table 15.
Author and Year | Resilience for Conventional Resin | Resilience for CAD/CAM Milled Resin | Resilience for 3D-Printed Resin | Exposure Agent/Aging Technique | Testing Machine Used | Authors Suggestions/Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tas¸ın et al., 2022 [30] | Median in (MJ/m3) (A) Temdent Classic (PMMA): Thermocycling: (i) 0 cycles: 0.77 (ii) 2500 cycles: 0.64 (iii) 10,000 cycles: 0.53 (B) Protemp (Bis-Acryl): Thermocycling: (i) 0 cycles: 0.98 (ii) 2500 cycles: 0.81 (iii) 10,000 cycles: 0.72 |
Median in (MJ/m3) (C) Duo Cad (PMMA): Thermocycling: (i) 0 cycles: 1.04 (ii) 2500 cycles: 0.93 (iii) 10,000 cycles: 0.85 |
Median in (MJ/m3) (D) Temporis (composite resin): Thermocycling: (i) 0 cycles: 1.12 (ii) 2500 cycles: 1.03 (iii) 10,000 cycles: 0.74 |
Thermocycling | Universal testing machine | Resilience results after thermocycling for 10,000 cycles: CAD/CAM milled PMMA > 3D-Printed composite resin > Conventional Bisacrylic > conventional PMMA |