. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 8.

Published in final edited form as: Merrill Palmer Q (Wayne State Univ Press). 2010 Jan;56(1):80–103. doi: 10.1353/mpq.0.0040

Table 3.

Group Differences in Concurrent Peer Relations

Dependent Variable	Aggressive Victimized		Withdrawn Victimized		Disagreeable		Nonaggressive Withdrawn		Nonwithdrawn Aggressive		Nonwithdrawn Agreeable
Dependent Variable	M	(SD)	M	(SD)	M	(SD)	M	(SD)	M	(SD)	M	(SD)
Acceptance
Self-reports	2.67_c	(0.59)	2.51_c	(0.64)	3.14_b	(0.53)	3.11_b	(0.56)	3.41_a	(0.44)	3.56_a	(0.49)
Peer reports	−0.29_b	(0.84)	−0.16_b	(0.76)	−0.04_b	(0.79)	−0.17_b	(0.81)	−0.25_b	(0.56)	0.34_a	(0.98)
Friendship
Conflict	1.87_ab	(0.55)	1.54_c	(0.46)	1.91_a	(0.57)	1.71_bc	(0.52)	1.74	(0.74)	1.64_bc	(0.58)
Quality	4.08_b	(0.61)	3.91_b	(0.54)	3.59_c	(0.67)	3.93_b	(0.59)	4.33_a	(0.26)	4.17_ab	(0.48)
Social problems
Maternal reports	0.26_a	(0.23)	0.27_a	(0.22)	0.20_ab	(0.28)	0.18_ab	(0.22)	0.12_bc	(0.14)	0.07_c	(0.10)
Self-reports	0.39_a	(0.31)	0.43_a	(0.26)	0.39_a	(0.35)	0.31	(0.23)	0.25_b	(0.18)	0.19_b	(0.18)

Note. N = 201 for friendship nominations. N = 224 for all other variables. Across rows, numbers with different subscripts differ significantly (p < .05) in LSD contrasts.