Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 8.
Published in final edited form as: Merrill Palmer Q (Wayne State Univ Press). 2010 Jan;56(1):80–103. doi: 10.1353/mpq.0.0040

Table 4.

Group Differences in Prospective Adjustment

Dependent Variable Aggressive Victimized Withdrawn Victimized Disagreeable Nonaggressive Withdrawn Nonwithdrawn Aggressive Nonwithdrawn Agreeable
M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD)
Externalizing Problems
 Maternal reports 0.28a (0.16) 0.12c (0.16) 0.23ab (0.17) 0.10c (0.15) 0.19b (0.16) 0.09c (0.11)
 Self-reports 0.41a (0.28) 0.25b (0.26) 0.52a (0.32) 0.24b (0.19) 0.45a (0.25) 0.25b (0.19)
Internalizing problems
 Maternal reports 0.20bc (0.14) 0.39a (0.19) 0.28b (0.22) 0.29b (0.25) 0.18c (0.17) 0.14c (0.14)
 Self-reports 0.32 (0.23) 0.41a (0.25) 0.38a (0.32) 0.34 (0.23) 0.32 (0.21) 0.25b (0.22)
Self-worth
 Behavioral conduct 2.77b (0.49) 3.09a (0.57) 2.77b (0.62) 3.18a (0.50) 2.74b (0.66) 3.23a (0.54)
 Global 2.86cd (0.61) 2.74d (0.54) 3.10bc (0.59) 3.21b (0.61) 2.88cd (0.70) 3.46a (0.57)

Note. N = 224. Numbers with different subscripts differ significantly (p < .05) in LSD contrasts. Repeated measures ANOVAs revealed no time by cluster group interactions, so scores represent the average of eighth- and ninth-grade reports.