Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 21;33(7):1863–1873. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05156-y

Table 1.

Cross-tabulation of patients’ and surgeons’ answers to the question “Have you/has the patient had a previous POP operation?” (n = 4629)

Has the surgeon reported a previous POP operation?a Total
No patient history available Confirmed a previous POP operation Dismissed a previous POP operationf Did not answerc
Has the patient reported a previous POP operation?b Did not answerc 24e 534 29 12e 599
Confirmed a previous gynaecological operation 7 376 44 11 438
Rejected a previous POP operation 2 48 5 0 55
No previous answers registered in GynOp 0 85 3 2 90
Confirmed a previous POP operation 38 3215 138f 56 3,447
Total 71 4258 219 81 4,629d

GynOp = Swedish National Quality Register for Gynaecological Surgery; POP = pelvic organ prolapse

aSurgeons’ answers (4629–81 = 4548) regarding previous operation (4258) yielded a correct classification of patients (by the surgeons alone) of 93%

bThe patients’ answers (4629−599 = 4030) regarding previous operations (3447) yielded a correct classification of patients (by the patients alone) of 85.6%

cPatients answered the question in 4030 of 4629 cases (87.1%)

dIn total, the patients and surgeons answered the question correctly in 97% of cases

eIn 0.8% of cases, neither the patient nor the surgeon answered the question

fDoctors dismissed a previous POP operation in 5.8% of cases. Of those, 138 (63%) were reported by the patients as recurrent operations (i.e., as previous POP operation)