Table 2.

Comparison of rest HARP ratio, contraction HARP ratio, and Valsalva HARP ratio between groups. A Kruskal–Wallis test was run if not otherwise specified

Parameters	Group 1: successful (n = 77)	Group 2, dislodgment/failureto relieve POP symptoms (n = 49)	Group 3: pain/discomfort(n = 20)	Comparison	Significance
Rest HARP ratio, mean (SD)	2.93 (0.59)	3.24 (0.67)	3.20 (0.99)	All groups	0.027*
				Group 1 vs 2	0.021**
				Group 1 vs 3	0.483**
				Group 2 vs 3	0.979**
Contraction HARP ratio, median (IQR)	2.42 (0.67)	2.59 (0.72)	2.44 (1.01)	All groups	0.116
Valsalva HARP ratio, median (IQR)	4.65 (1.56)	5.32 (2.08)	4.60 (2.46)	All groups	0.006
				Group 1 vs 2	0.004***
				Group 1 vs 3	1.000***
				Group 2 vs 3	0.605***

Bold indicates the stastistically significant parameters

*Welch’s ANOVA

**Games–Howell post hoc test

***Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison