Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 8;12:11598. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16044-2

Table 5.

Effect of PGPB on chlorophyll content, of maize plants 70, 84 and 98 DAS.

Treatment Chlorophyll content (μg/cm2)
70 DAS 84 DAS 98 DAS
Control 44.8 ± 1.5e 46.5 ± 1.1c 37.7 ± 1.0c
B. amyloliquefaciens 51.8 ± 1.9bcde 48.4 ± 0.7bc 38.3 ± 0.6bc
B. licheniformis 60.1 ± 1.9ab 49.1 ± 0.6abc 38.5 ± 1.0bc
B. mojavensis 61.4 ± 0.9a 53.5 ± 2.5ab 40.4 ± 1.4abc
B. pumilus 55.7 ± 4.4abc 53.0 ± 2.9ab 41.7 ± 2.3ab
B. subtilis 57.5 ± 6.2ab 53.2 ± 1.8ab 41.7 ± 0.7ab
B. pseudomycoides 58.1 ± 2.3ab 53.0 ± 2.7ab 43.2 ± 2.0a
B. velezensis 53.7 ± 3.1abcd 54.5 ± 0.9a 42.2 ± 1.3ab
A. chroococcum 47.9 ± 1.6cde 52.1 ± 1.9ab 41.5 ± 0.5abc
P. megaterium 46.7 ± 1.8de 53.4 ± 2.7ab 41.8 ± 1.7ab
Mix 53.2 ± 3.5abcde 52.7 ± 1.5ab 40.6 ± 0.9abc
Ftreat 9.845*** 5.358** 5.420***

DAS, days after sowing. Mix: Mix of Priestia megaterium B004 + Azotobacter chroococcum A004 with zeolite as a carrier. Means followed by the same letter for treatments are not significantly different according to Duncan test (p < 0.05). Values presented are mean values of three replicates ± standard deviation. Significance levels: *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01.