Table 3.

Discrimination of each predictive model for outcomes using AUC

Models	AUC (95% CI)	P-value	Models	AUC (95% CI)	P-value
Hospital death
SOFA Score	0.765 (0.734–0.797)	< 0.001	+ TyG index	0.772 (0.742–0.802)	< 0.001
LODS Score	0.791 (0.763–0.820)	< 0.001	+ TyG index	0.796 (0.768–0.824)	< 0.001
OASIS Score	0.798 (0.771–0.824)	< 0.001	+ TyG index	0.801 (0.774–0.828)	< 0.001
SIRS Score	0.689 (0.659–0.720)	< 0.001	+ TyG index	0.706 (0.676–0.736)	< 0.001
APSIII	0.794 (0.766–0.822)	< 0.001	+ TyG index	0.798 (0.771–0.825)	< 0.001
SAPSII	0.834 (0.811–0.858)	< 0.001	+ TyG index	0.838 (0.815–0.861)	< 0.001
ICU death
SOFA Score	0.811 (0.780–0.842)	< 0.001	+ TyG index	0.815 (0.785–0.846)	< 0.001
LODS Score	0.834 (0.806–0.862)	< 0.001	+ TyG index	0.837 (0.810–0.865)	< 0.001
OASIS Score	0.810 (0.780–0.840)	< 0.001	+ TyG index	0.812 (0.782–0.842)	< 0.001
SIRS Score	0.708 (0.675–0.742)	< 0.001	+ TyG index	0.722 (0.690–0.755)	< 0.001
APSIII	0.829 (0.800–0.857)	< 0.001	+ TyG index	0.831 (0.803–0.858)	< 0.001
SAPSII	0.854 (0.828–0.879)	< 0.001	+ TyG index	0.856 (0.831–0.881)	< 0.001

AUC area under curve, SOFA sequential organ failure assessment, LODS logistic organ dysfunction system, OASIS Oxford acute severity of illness score, SIRS systemic inflammatory response syndrome, APSIII acute physiology score III, SAPSII, simplified acute physiological score II, TyG index triglyceride-glucose index, ICU intensive care unit