Table 3.
Sphaerodactylus townsendi | Anolis carolinensis | Podarcis muralis |
Gallus
gallus |
Gekko hokouensis |
---|---|---|---|---|
LG1 | 1q | 3 | 3 | 1p |
LG2 | 1p | 1 | 5,7 | 2 |
LG3 (XY) | 2q | 2 | 12,13,16,18,30,33 | 1q |
LG4 | 3q | 4 | 1q,14 | 13 |
LG5 | 4q | 6,18 | 8,26,28 | 3 |
LG6 | 5p | 10 | 1p,23 | 14 |
LG7 | 2p | 11,17 | ZW | ZW |
LG8 | 3p | 5,14 | 6,9 | 15 |
LG9 | 4p | 7 | 2q | unplaced |
LG10 | micro | 9 | 4q | 7 |
LG11 | 6q | 12 | 2p,27 | 8 |
LG12 | micro | 15,ZW | 17,22,24*** | 9 |
LG13 | micro | 16,ZW | 4p,15 | 11 |
LG14 | 4 | 8 | 11 | unplaced |
LG15 | 6p | 13 | 27 | 12 |
LG16 | micro | 8 | 21 | unplaced |
LG17 | micro | 14 | 10 | unplaced |
Scaffolds were called if linkage groups described by Srikulnath et al. (2015) were corroborated by syntenic mapping to Anolis, Podarcis, and/or Gallus. Note that the snake (Naja) was omitted due to its collinearity with Anolis genome.
*** indicates changes in annotated chicken chromosomes making up the linkage group from that reported by Srikulnath et al. (2015) from “21 and 25” to “22 and 24.”