Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 1;113(3):272–287. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esac016

Table 3.

A key to navigate synteny across largest fragments of the reference genome assembly relative to Anolis, Podarcis, and Gallus, according to the Gekko hokouensis (Gekko) physical mapping

Sphaerodactylus townsendi Anolis carolinensis Podarcis muralis Gallus
gallus
Gekko hokouensis
LG1 1q 3 3 1p
LG2 1p 1 5,7 2
LG3 (XY) 2q 2 12,13,16,18,30,33 1q
LG4 3q 4 1q,14 13
LG5 4q 6,18 8,26,28 3
LG6 5p 10 1p,23 14
LG7 2p 11,17 ZW ZW
LG8 3p 5,14 6,9 15
LG9 4p 7 2q unplaced
LG10 micro 9 4q 7
LG11 6q 12 2p,27 8
LG12 micro 15,ZW 17,22,24*** 9
LG13 micro 16,ZW 4p,15 11
LG14 4 8 11 unplaced
LG15 6p 13 27 12
LG16 micro 8 21 unplaced
LG17 micro 14 10 unplaced

Scaffolds were called if linkage groups described by Srikulnath et al. (2015) were corroborated by syntenic mapping to Anolis, Podarcis, and/or Gallus. Note that the snake (Naja) was omitted due to its collinearity with Anolis genome.

*** indicates changes in annotated chicken chromosomes making up the linkage group from that reported by Srikulnath et al. (2015) from “21 and 25” to “22 and 24.”