Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 9;22:1322. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13751-3

Table 2.

Final Multivariable Model of Vaccine Resources, Practices, and Attitudes in Rural vs. Urban Adolescent Healthcare Providers, 2019

Rural Urban Multivariable
adjusted odds ratio
(95% CI, p) of rural vs. urban provider status
Clinic environment resources
 Evening or weekend adolescent vaccination appointments available
  Yes 41 (30%) 189 (63%) 0.21 (0.12, 0.36), p < .001
  No or unknown 94 (70%) 113 (37%) ref
 Standing orders to administer all recommended adolescent vaccine
  Yes 104 (77%) 155 (51%) 2.81 (1.61, 4.91), p < .001
  No or unknown 31 (23%) 147 (49%) ref
Personal practices
 Worked on a prior adolescent vaccine quality improvement project
  Yes 23 (17%) 92 (31%) 0.52 (0.28, 0.98), p = .043
  No or unknown 112 (83%) 210 (70%) ref
 Provide HPV vaccine information before it is due
  Yes 46 (34%) 60 (20%) 3.10 (1.68, 5.71), p < .001
  No or unknown 89 (66%) 242 (80%) ref
 Almost always recommend HPV vaccine during urgent care visit
  Yes 17 (13%) 66 (22%) 0.37 (0.18, 0.79), p = .009
  Do not do urgent care visits 6 (4%) 24 (8%) 0.38 (0.12, 1.23), p = .106
  No 112 (83%) 212 (70%) ref

Multivariable odds ratios adjusted for all included exposures in the final model, plus provider specialty, number of providers at their practice site, and the proportion of adolescent patients on Medicaid