Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 27;13:863839. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.863839

TABLE 4.

Certainty of evidence: CHM compared to control treatment for T2DM with NAFLD.

Certainty assessment No. of patients Effect Certainty Importance
No. of Studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations CHM Control treatment Relative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
Triglyceride
17 Randomized trials Serious a Serious b Not serious Not serious None 690 687 - MD 0.35 lower (0.51 lower to 0.19 lower) ⊕⊕⊚⊚Low Important
Total cholesterol
 15 Randomized trials Serious a Serious b Not serious Not serious None 609 606 - MD 0.58 SD lower (0.8 lower to 0.36 lower) ⊕⊕⊚⊚Low Important
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
15 Randomized trials Serious a Serious b Not serious Not serious None 591 588 - MD 0.37 lower (0.47 lower to 0.26 lower) ⊕⊕⊚⊚Low Important
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol
13 Randomized trials Serious a Serious b Not serious Not serious None 516 513 - MD 0.2 higher (0.1 higher to 0.29 higher) ⊕⊕⊚⊚Low Important
Alanine transaminase
17 Randomized trials Serious a Serious b Not serious Not serious None 703 700 - MD 4.99 lower (6.64 lower to 3.33 lower) ⊕⊕⊚⊚Low Important
Aspartate transaminase
17 Randomized trials Serious a Serious b Not serious Not serious None 703 700 - MD 4.76 lower (6.35 lower to 3.16 lower) ⊕⊕⊚⊚Low Important
Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance
9 Randomized trials Serious a Serious b Not serious Not serious None 313 311 - MD 1.01 lower (1.22 lower to 0.79 lower) ⊕⊕⊚⊚Low Important
Fasting blood glucose
18 Randomized trials Serious a Serious b Not serious Not serious None 733 730 - MD 0.87 lower (1.13 lower to 0.61 lower) ⊕⊕⊚⊚Low Important
Two-hour postprandial glucose
14 Randomized trials Serious a Serious b Not serious Not serious None 595 592 - MD 1.45 lower (2 lower to 0.91 lower) ⊕⊕⊚⊚Low Important
Body mass index
11 Randomized trials Serious a Serious b Not serious Not serious None 366 364 - MD 0.73 lower (1.35 lower to 0.12 lower) ⊕⊕⊚⊚Low Important
Overall effective rate
16 Randomized trials Serious a Not serious Not serious Not serious None 570/645 (88.4%) 413/642 (64.3%) RR 1.37 (1.29–1.46) 238 more per 1,000 (from 187 more to 296 more) ⊕⊕⊕⊚Moderate Important

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference; RR, risk ratio; a, the risk of bias assessment is mostly “unclear risk” in articles; b, ihere is serious heterogeneity among the studies included in the analysis of this outcome.