Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 14.
Published in final edited form as: Psychosom Med. 2022 Apr 14;84(6):669–678. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001082

Table 3.

Twenty-five week mean scores reflecting biobehavioral differences in CFS between participants who self-report improvers and non-improvers.

M SE 95% CI for Difference n Delta SE Delta t for Delta p for Delta D
Push-crash
 Non-improvers 4.03 0.09 91
 Improvers 3.98 0.17 −0.46- 0.31 37 0.05 0.18 −0.28 0.78 0.04
Limiting activity
 Non-improvers 3.39 0.07 90
 Improvers 3.25 0.11 −0.12-1.39 37 0.04 0.13 −1.08 0.28 0.21
Healthy Pacing
 Non-improvers 3.89 0.08 90
 Improvers 3.81 0.12 −0.20-0.37 37 0.08 0.14 0.57 0.57 0.11
Practical Support
 Non-improvers 4.96 0.12 90
 Improvers 4.85 0.2 −0.34-0.57 37 0.14 0.23 0.47 0.64 0.09
Hassles Frequency
 Non-improvers 21.48 0.72 90
 Improvers 21.63 1.31 −2.93-2.61 37 0.15 1.4 −0.14 0.91 0.02
Hassles Intensity
 Non-improvers 1.62 0.04 90
 Improvers 1.59 0.04 −0.19-0.15 37 0.03 0.06 0.51 0.61 0.1
Uplift Frequency
 Non-improvers 18.83 0.8 90
 Improvers 20.68 1.35 −4.85-1.15 37 1.85 1.52 −1.22 0.22 0.23
Uplift Intensity
 Non-improvers 1.51 0.04 90
 Improvers 1.65 0.05 −0.26- −0.01 37 0.14 0.06 −2.08 0.043 0.4
Heart Rate Variability#
 Non-improvers 21.47 1.15 90
 Improvers 27.4 3.25 −11.33- −0.52 35 5.93 2.73 −2.17 0.032 0.38
#

Root mean square standard deviation (RMSSD) (ms)

Delta = difference between participants who improved vs. participants who did not improve.