TABLE 4.
Comparison of genotypes and allele distribution frequencies between the CC group and the SIL group.
| Genotype and allele | CC (n = 482) | SIL (n = 775) | P | OR [95% CI] | Statistical model | P′ | P′′ | OR [95% CI] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 235 (48.8%) | 351 (45.3%) | Dominant | 0.2191 | 0.2195 | 1.165[0.913–1.485] | ||
| AG | 199 (41.3%) | 337 (43.5%) | Recessive | 0.5878 | 0.5914 | 1.116[0.751–1.657] | ||
| GG | 48 (9.96%) | 87 (11.2%) | 0.4616 | Additive | 0.2419 | 0.2423 | 1.115[0.929–1.339] | |
| A | 669 (69.4%) | 1,039 (67.0%) | ||||||
| G | 295 (30.6%) | 511 (33.0%) | 0.2165 | 1.115[0.938–1.326] |
CC, cervical cancer; SIL, cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
P: p-value (CC vs. SIL ); p-values <0.05 are shown in bold.
P’: age was adjusted.
P”: the p-value was calculated using 10,000 permutations for each model to correct the multiple tests.